Close
Likes
In recent years, Donald Trump has come under increasing scrutiny for his alleged ties to Russian president Vladimir Putin. It has been speculated that Trump may be receiving support from Putin, and some have even gone as far as to suggest that Trump has become a puppet of Putin’s. Amidst all the noise, it can be difficult to ascertain the truth of the matter. Does Trump support Putin - or not? In this post, we will be taking a look at the evidence and assessing Trump’s stance on Putin. We’ll consider both sides of the debate and examine the facts in greater detail. So strap in and prepare to travel with us down the rabbit hole of Trump and Putin. Let’s take a closer look at the evidence…
While President Trump has at times praised Vladimir Putin, the overall stance of the U.S. administration is one of disapproval and condemnation of many of Putin's policies. Relations between the U.S. and Russia remain strained as recent sanctions demonstrate.
The relationship between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has been a subject of much speculation and debate since the beginning of Trump’s presidential campaign. On one hand, there are those who allege that Trump is too cozy with the Russian president, going so far as to suggest shady connections between the two political figures that may not be in the best interests of the United States. On the other hand, others argue that the relationship is nothing more than a diplomatic one grounded in common interests such as de-escalating tensions in Syria.
Undoubtedly, Trump and Putin have had many interactions throughout the course of Trump’s presidency. They have held several meetings, both in person and over the phone, to discuss matters such as nuclear arms control and oil prices. While some say these meetings prove that there is an underlying level of trust between the two men, others posit that this could merely be large-scale business negotiations.
At its core, it is quite difficult to pinpoint if there is a special bond between Trump and Putin because it is a complex issue - one with various aspects to take into account. What we can say for sure is that their public displays indicate at least a semblance of respect towards one another, which likely stems from the desire to benefit strategically from one another without taking unnecessary risks. Despite this knowledge though, some mysteries remain about what these two prominent figures keep hidden behind closed doors. To attempt to answer this question further, it will be necessary to examine possible links between them in greater detail - which we will address in the following section.
While much of Trump and Putin’s relationship has been called into question, it cannot be denied that there may be certain connections between the two. After all, one of the more notable connections between them is the fact that both men have shown admiration for one another. For instance, in 2015 when asked about his opinion of Putin, Trump reportedly stated that he was an "honorable" man who was doing a “fantastic job...running his country” [1]. On the other hand, there have also been reports that Putin has shown admiration for Trump [2], saying he is a “bright and talented person” whose “unquestionable talent as a businessman” should be respected [3]. The interesting thing to note here is while Putin had given praise to other presidential candidates that competed against Trump, he had notably not given similar praise to anyone else except for Trump. This naturally raises questions about possible connections between the two men.
Although those words of praise could simply be respectful gestures from two influential figures to one another and nothing more, it does not change the fact that all of these incidents only add fuel to the idea that something more may be going on behind the scenes of their relationship. Whether these connections are political or strictly personal remains to be seen since further evidence will need to be gathered before any kind of definitive judgment can be made. Whilst both sides of this argument are worth debating depending on which perspective someone might take, it ultimately comes down to what kind of evidence exists in order to support either claim.
Answering this question requires audiences to look at what actions have been taken by both parties and whether those actions have undermined global norms or not. After all, actions often speak louder than words and so fully understanding this controversial relationship requires us to look beyond what has been said by each figure and instead focus on what they have actually done. Moving forward then, it would seem beneficial to shift our attention away from merely discussing potential connections between Putin and Trump and instead explore whether any action taken by either party in this relationship supports the notion that Trump might actually abide by what Putin wants.
[1] http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/17/politics/trump-putin-remarks/index.html
[2] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/05/18/vladimir-putin-praised-donald-trump-press-conference/101744132/
[3] https://www.npr.org/2016/12/15/505989067/vladimir-putin-expresses-respect-for-trump
In examining whether President Trump supports Putin, one must also look at his actions. Throughout the Trump presidency, there have been a variety of decisions taken by the president in which he has seemed to align himself with Putin or his policies. Critics have pointed to Trump's reluctance to criticize Russia publicly and for falsely denying that Russia interfered in the 2016 election as examples of this alignment. On key policy issues, Trump also appears to have advocated for positions in line with what Putin wanted. For instance, in regards to Syria, Trump was more willing to accept Russian involvement than previous US administrations had been. He has even suggested withdrawing US troops from South Korea--this would be sure to please Putin, who likely wishes for less US engagement in the region.
At the same time, defenders of Trump might argue that he is simply trying to protect American interests. He may see working alongside Russia as a way to further those aspirations. Others might point out that on certain topics, such as sanctions against Moscow for their activities in Crimea, Trump has actually taken a harder stance than Obama did during his presidency. This suggests that Trump is not necessarily favoring Putin and his agenda.
Ultimately, this is an issue wherein it is difficult to discern exactly how much support President Trump actually gives to Putin and his policies. Was it just friendly talk or do his actions demonstrate deeper affinity? To gain further clarification, one should consider how the current administration has acted regarding current sanctions and potential new ones against Russia.
Moving on from to the question of whether Trump’s actions have been supportive of Putin, it is worthwhile to question his record regarding sanctions against Russia. To some, Trump’s approach has been too lenient when compared to past presidents who enforced harsh sanctions against Russia for its involvement in Crimea in 2014 and its alleged election interference in 2016. However, others point out that Trump has implemented numerous economic sanctions and punitive measures since 2017, including a number of new ones announced throughout 2018 by both the president and Congress.
For example, in April 2018, the US imposed sanctions on seven Russian oligarchs and 17 senior Russian government officials, as well as the 12 Russian intelligence officers indicted by Robert Mueller’s investigation into the meddling by Russia in the 2016 election. This was followed by a further tightening of restrictions with the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) law passed in August 2017.
Supporters of Trump also note that he also expelled 60 Russian diplomats over accusations of Russian involvement in a nerve agent attack on an ex-spy living in Britain. That said, critics still claim that even with these actions, Trump continues to show favoritism towards Putin - something that may be explored more closely when looking at public opinion on the matter. In any case, it cannot be said with certainty how much support Trump is lending Putin considering the many sanctions he has enforced. It can safely be concluded here though that there is evidence for both sides of this argument. As we move onto analyzing public opinion, we may be closer to understanding just how deep the relationship between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin goes.
It is unclear how much support President Donald Trump has for Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Trump has enforced numerous economic sanctions and punitive measures against Russia, as well as expelling 60 Russian diplomats. There is evidence for both sides of this argument, and understanding public opinion may further clarify the relationship between the two leaders.
The opinions on the overall Trump-Putin relationship have been mixed. On one side, some are of the opinion that President Trump is perhaps too willing to defer to or even favor Russia and its leader. This belief has been bolstered by reports such as those coming from The Washington Post and NPR that detail efforts by Trump's campaign officials to gain access to and utilize stolen Russian documents in order to aid their cause during the election. Additionally, some feel that despite the sanctions against Russia, Trump may still be allowing the country’s interests take precedent over the safety of United States citizens.
However, there are also counterarguments which suggest that President Trump has in fact been tough on Russia when necessary and is looking out for the best interest of his own citizens. For example, many point to his signing of a $716 billion defense bill to improve US military strength in Europe as evidence of him approaching the situation with Russia with caution instead of favor. Further still, Trump has repeatedly pushed back against negative perceptions of his relationship with Putin, citing topics such as terrorism and North Korean nuclear negotiations that he believes show this is not necessarily the case.
It is clear then, that the perception surrounding behavior between President Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin remains disputed by those who view it separately through a different lens. Regardless if one leans towards supporting or opposing their relationship, it will be of utmost importance going forward to ensure that whatever aligns between them benefits both nations — as much as possible — and does not contribute negatively to larger geopolitical issues at hand. Moreover, it will be interesting to see how both leaders decide to move forward in their respective countries and around the globe given recent international developments, which will be examined more closely in the forthcoming section.
The future of the relationship between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin is uncertain. Some believe that the two leaders will continue to work together as close partners, while others feel that both of their political aspirations will eventually clash.
On one hand, some argue that the Trump-Putin relationship has been beneficial for both countries. President Trump has praised Putin’s leadership on a number of issues, such as Russia’s success in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and curtailing nuclear proliferation. On the other hand, some are concerned that the two countries have comparatively divergent interests, potentially leading to an eventual split in their views.
Proponents of continued collaboration between the U.S. and Russia point to areas like trade and foreign policy where there is potential for cooperation or alignment of goals, such as resolving conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan. Others claim that this idea is too optimistic given Trump’s prior comments about Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election and its involvement in Crimea, which prompted economic sanctions from the U.S.. Even if they decide to cooperate more closely in the future, it is likely not going to come at a cost of compromising other actions deemed necessary by either country.
The complex dynamics of the evolving relationship between these two pivotal world leaders will shape global politics for years to come. The outcome could be cooperation with mutual respect and understanding — or confrontation that puts both countries on opposing sides once again. Only time will tell how this story will unfold.
President Trump's relationship with Vladimir Putin has evolved over the years in both positive and negative ways. Initially, the two seemed to have a strong rapport built upon mutual admiration for one another. This was evidenced by President Trump's embrace of some of Putin's policies, such as his support for the annexation of Crimea and improving relations between Russia and the United States. However, their relationship changed over time as new evidence began to emerge regarding Putin's alleged interference in the 2016 U.S election. Furthermore, President Trump's policies on issues such as sanctions and energy have been met with resistance by Putin. Overall, it is clear that President Trump has had an evolving relationship with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Political opponents of President Trump have frequently raised concerns about his alleged support of Russia. Several of their arguments point to the lack of a strong response from the President against Russian aggression in Europe, which has raised suspicions of collusion between the two leaders. Additionally, opponents suggest that President Trump's statements and actions pertaining to diplomatic relations with Russia have been far too friendly for an American leader, indicating that he is too willing to ally himself with Putin's government. Finally, there have been reports that members of the Trump campaign had suspicious contacts with Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election, although no concrete evidence has yet come forth to prove any misconduct on the part of either party. Through these different arguments, it is clear that many political opponents feel strongly that President Trump provides too much support to Russia.
President Trump has proposed a number of initiatives regarding Russia. The most notable of these was the 2018 Helsinki Summit, where both Presidents discussed issues such as nuclear non-proliferation and security in the Middle East; President Trump also held a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin outside the summit. Following this summit, President Trump held several meetings with Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, which discussed topics such as strategic arms control, counterterrorism, and regional conflict.
In addition to these diplomatic engagements, President Trump has officially recognized the annexation of Crimea by Moscow and sought to lift economic sanctions imposed by his predecessor's administration. In September 2018, he discussed plans to hold a second summit with Putin in 2019 but has since been blocked due to allegations of Russian interference in US elections.
There is considerable evidence to suggest that President Trump has supported and encouraged Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The most obvious instance of this are the repeated positive words of praise offered by Trump about Putin and Russia in general, both before and during his presidency. These verbal affirmations have ranged from describing Putin as a “strong leader” and praising RT (Russia Today, the state-funded news network) for “being nice to him” all the way up to more recent comments such as Trump's claims that the two could begin a “great relationship” in 2019.
Additionally, some of Trump's actions have also been seen as signs of encouragement for Putin. For example, in 2017 - during his first year in office - Trump removed sanctions against companies associated with Oleg Deripaska, a close ally of Putin. This move was widely viewed as a sign that he was willing to go easy on Russia, both then and in the future.
Trump has also been heavily criticized for his failure to take concrete action in response to Russian interference in U.S. elections and other security concerns. While it's impossible to know whether or not Trump actively avoids taking action due to fear of annoying Putin, this inaction appears to be inconsistent with any other policy stances taken by the President on other topics.
Finally, there have been several reports linking Donald Trump with players within Moscow that have questionable background links to Russia’s government or its organized crime networks, including Boris Epshteyn, Felix Sater and potential business partner Aras Agalarov -- all people known to have cordial relationships with Putin himself.
In conclusion, while it is impossible to know President Trump's true motivations without him explaining them himself, there is considerable evidence suggesting he may support Putin and Russia overall.
Since taking office, President Trump has taken several steps to help improve relations between the United States and Russia. In 2017, he hosted Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Oval Office, meeting directly to discuss a wide range of topics including cooperation in Syria and Mutual threats posed by North Korea.
Trump also responded positively to various diplomatic initiatives initiated by Russian President Vladimir Putin. This included a proposal for a new arms control treaty which would include the United States, Russia and China. The treaty, called the Trilateral Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (TSRAT) was seen as a positive step towards better relations between the nations.
Additionally, President Trump also reached out to Putin before his inauguration in 2017, suggesting that they should meet soon, which stirred controversy among some within the U.S. government at the time. In 2019, Trump stated that he wanted to hold a summit with Putin and was actively pursuing this diplomatic possibility.
Most recently President Trump pulled out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), which had been in place since 1987 and had deterred nuclear war between the US and Russia. Although President Trump's decision caused some controversy around the world, his team argued that it could ultimately lead to better relations between the two countries. This remains unclear however and will likely depend on how both Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin manage their negotiations going forward.
It's someone that claims to be a conservative ( although mostly wingnuts ), that supports Russian aggression
It doesn't get much simpler than that.... or so I thought 🤣
Only other difference (from then to now) is - not only DIDN'T the Confederacy invite foreign Navy(s) offshore to threaten the Union, but Confederacy also DIDN'T go begging foreign Gov'ts for money to fight a war they started.
The same people crying😭 about Ukrainians somehow being victims of so-called Russian "aggression" are the same ones who (unsuccessfully) attempt to argue that the Confederacy was somehow victims of Northern "aggression".😂 FOH🤣
Tho vike fanz are sometimes a lil smarter than Colt fanz.😆
It was a simple yes or no question... the extra 6 words weren't even necessary.
So if one subscribes to the popular opinion of: *Azov & the current Ukraine Gov't holding on to what they took without any Western Nations interfering &/ or financing - *does that too make one a pro "Russian conservative"??
No one ever successfully argued U.S was ever historically "aggressive" towards neighboring Puerto Rico, or Hati, or D.R... etc...
*But imagine the response if Russia & China ever attempted to set up shop in the Caribbean Sea??
Other options considered would be the murdering of Cuban refugees off the Florida coast, blowing up a US ship in a harbor, (Remember the Maine!) Starting riots, and staging mortar and artillery fire to US military bases from Cuba.
But at that time-- figured your 'mention'👆 was in response to my question(s) of: [has Russia/ China ever colluded/ interfered in The Caribbean on similar levels as to NATO in the Black Sea?]
And tho my 60's history might be a little cloudy... don't remember USSR or China having anything to do with "Operation Northwoods".
But like I *asked *alluded to earlier-- ['if there's indeed a legit connection that I'm not seeing👀 then please show it to me'.]👍
Tho the NATO apologists could take that history👆 as 'cue'🤔 on how to end a "crisis".
And just 30 years after the "crisis"-compromise who eventually got the last laugh, U.S.A or U.S.S.R??😂🤣
*Wasn't it only the USSR directly involved,🤔 before they backed-out after only "5 weeks"??
*If not,👆 then again- Cuban 'conflict' is not really comparable.
...oh wait,🤔 there's no accurate comparison because there's no Russian/ Chinese version of NATO...
and both Russia & China have always respected the fact that The Gulf & Caribbean Sea is controlled by U.S... respect should work both ways, or not??
*What if* your next door neighbor makes an agreement with you to not invite a International cartel into your backyard, then your neighbor sides with Nazis & breaks yalls agreement🤔 - I'd be of the OPINION that you have every right to fight for your backyard, but that OPINION doesn't mean I'd support you😆 (or ur Nazi😈neighbors) - FOH!
*U would be Russia in that example,👆 the Cartel is NATO, and be clear-- the Black Sea is Russia's backyard, has been for centuries.
The Taliban used to be called the mujahideen back when Russia invaded Afghanistan. Guess who sent the Mujahideen monetary and material support.
Meanwhile, in East Palestine Ohio everything is fine and dandy.
I don't think there are any "pro-Putin" conservatives. I do think however that many people, like myself, feel that we shouldn't be meddling in foreign wars and are simultaneously tired of the American government putting the American people last.
We are currently at the beginnings of a 2008-esque bank collapse because of trash government economic policy. Print and spend economics is causing out of control inflation, which has caused the Fed to destroy the bond market by ratcheting up interest, which in turn is causing a new liquidity crisis for 150+ banks. The SVB collapse is just the beginning. How many hundreds of billions more should we print and spend funding fo
This question was more aimed for the people that blindly follow the Russian angle of this conflict like the person below you.
But I do acknowledge the possibility is still VERY 'CREDIBLE', partly because Russia & China seemingly aren't gonna lay-down & allow themselves to be surrounded like Cuba currently is... & has been for the last 60 years.
And between U.S & the U.N. in the Caribbean Sea,🧐 they've had Cubans surrounded & out-gunned (since*'62), meaning: 'Cuba has NEVER BEEN A REAL THREAT', no matter hard HISstory books try to twist a narrative.
✌️
Just reference Ukraine. We will not stop with Russia. We will continue into China.
I'm not saying that because I'm advocating invading Mexico, but because I'm interested in how your opinion would change closer to home.
This shit really cracks me up.
I've gone over this a few times with you, though it usually is meet with you deflecting into some irrelevant shit that I don't support or ever did.
The US has blood on its hands, no doubt. We are involved in all kinds of shit we shouldn't. But people attempting to justify Russian's actions with ours is basically trying to make two wrongs a 'right'. It's healthy to be critical of our government. I have all kinds of criticism. But it's unhealthy when that criticism goes into being susceptible to foreign influence.
I may distrust our government, but I distrust those two governments even more. They are actively trying to shape US public to benefit their own motives. And I can assure you, their motives to share our interests.
It's the US propaganda that's killing ppl, not Russian memes. Putin has had his hand out to the US trying to form an alliance for years. We are the ones who pushed him to form stronger bonds with China. And the crazy part is, we don't even give a fuck about Ukraine. We never have.
But think i'm buying into Russian propaganda. Get real.
it's another CHINA AND RUSSIA are bad communist topics
because the BIDEN REGIME created a war in ukraine lmao because they can't control neither RUSSIA nor CHINA'S resources and economy
DUH
just look at the link that g0d posted from fox, it leads to another link of the Pentagon biden regime now trying to justify war against the COMMUNIST NATIONS "north korea, china and russia" (i mean just how incredibly dopey do you have to be, to believe that the USA and the West are the good guys at this point and that THEY SHOULD BE THE ONLY ONES WITH WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, meanwhile, they're the ones who have gone around the globe BULLYING EVERY OTHER NATION THAT DOESN'T CONFORM TO THEIR RULES and give them their resources?
YOU REALLY HAVE TO BE SOME KIND OF TARD TO BELIEVE THIS SHIT !
https://www.google.com/amp/s/odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2023-Unclassified-Report.pdf